Manual vs. Automation Regression Testing: The Pros and Cons

In the realm of software testing, two distinct approaches reign supreme: manual and automated testing.

While manual testing relies on human intervention to execute test cases, automated testing harnesses the power of technology to streamline the process.

And both approaches come with advantages and disadvantages.

Below, we analyze each method, particularly in the context of regression testing—a critical aspect of software quality assurance.

By exploring the strengths and limitations of manual and automated regression testing, you'll gain insights into optimizing your testing strategy for enhanced efficiency and reliability.

Manual vs. Automation Regression Testing - Points to Consider

Manual Testing


  1. Human Insight: Manual regression testers can apply their domain knowledge, intuition, and creativity to explore various scenarios and uncover unexpected issues that automated tools might miss.
  2. Adaptability: It's easier to adapt to changes in requirements, user interfaces, or application behavior without requiring significant modifications to test scripts or configurations.
  3. Exploratory Testing: A manual approach allows testers to perform exploratory testing, where they can delve deep into the application to identify complex bugs, usability issues, and edge cases that automated tests may overlook.


  1. Time-Consuming: Manual testing can be time-consuming, especially for large and complex applications or when performing repetitive regression tests across multiple environments or platforms.
  2. Error-Prone: Manual testing is prone to human errors, inconsistencies, and subjective interpretations, leading to potential discrepancies in test results and reduced reliability.
  3. Limited Coverage: Manual testing may not provide comprehensive coverage of all test scenarios, especially when dealing with large datasets, complex business logic, or repetitive tasks that are better suited for automation.

Automated Testing


  1. Efficiency: Automated regression testing tools can execute regression tests quickly and efficiently, allowing testers to cover a large number of test scenarios in a shorter amount of time compared to manual testing.
  2. Reusability: Automated test scripts can be reused across multiple regression cycles, environments, and platforms, saving time and effort in test creation and maintenance.
  3. Accuracy: Automated tests produce consistent and repeatable results, reducing the risk of human errors and ensuring reliable test outcomes across different runs.


  1. Initial Setup Overhead: Setting up automated tests requires an initial investment of time and resources to develop test scripts, configure test environments, and integrate testing tools with the application under test.
  2. Maintenance Complexity: Automated regression tests require ongoing maintenance to keep pace with changes in the application, such as updates to user interfaces, workflows, or underlying technologies. Failure to maintain test scripts can lead to test failures or false positives.
  3. Limited Test Scope: Automated tests may struggle to handle complex test scenarios, dynamic user interfaces, or scenarios that require human judgment or intuition. They may also lack the ability to detect certain types of issues, such as visual defects or usability problems.

Choose the Right Method(s) for Regression Testing

As clearly shown, both manual and automation regressing testin tools have their advantages and disadvantages.

The manual approach offers human insight and adaptability but can be time-consuming and error-prone.

Automated testing, however, provides efficiency, reusability, and accuracy but requires initial setup overhead and ongoing maintenance.

The choice between manual and automated regression testing depends on factors such as the:

- nature of the application
- availability of resources
- desired level of test coverage and reliability

In practice, many organizations will adopt a hybrid approach, combining manual testing with automated tools to leverage the strengths of each method and maximize the effectiveness of their regression testing efforts.

Regardless of approach, investment management software companies can always partner with QA testing experts like Empaxis, which has years of experience having mastered the art of regression testing, both manually and automated.

Chat with an Expert

Get the latest in financial technology support, AI and digital transformation and investment operations outsourcing

Our monthly newsletter features helpful resources, articles, and best practices to implement within technology providers and investment firms